Occasionally I get queries about different parish programs and whether
or not they are "safe" for parish use. Case in point is the JustFaith
program, put on by Just Faith Ministries. Just Faith was founded in 1989
by a fellow by the name of Jack Jezreel, which is an interesting name
from a Biblical standpoint; the Valley of Jezreel was where King Jehu
had the apostate Queen Jezebel slain (2 Kings 9:1-10); it is also the
location of the Battle of Armageddon at the end of time. But I digress.
The program's website states:
JustFaith Ministries provides programs that transform people and expand
their commitment to social ministry. Through these life-changing
opportunities, members of a church or parish can study, explore and
experience Christ’s call to care for the poor and vulnerable in a
lively, challenging, multifaceted process in the context of a small
faith community.
Have any of you come across the JustFaith program in your parishes or
dioceses? Here is a run down of the program and some of its problems
from Phyllis Sower. Mrs. Sower has practiced law for 33 years, now
part-time, in Franklin County, KY. She is the co-founder and principal
of Our Lady of Guadalupe Academy/Corpus Christi High School in
Simpsonville, KY. and recently exposed the JustFaith program for the Los
Pequenos Pepper publication in the Diocese of Santa Fe. So, is the
JustFaith program Catholic? The following is from her article:
"I had already heard a little about the JustFaith program and some
concerns regarding it just prior to the time that two members of our
parish came to me to share their concerns. One of them had enrolled in
the course and brought to me the full set of materials she purchased for
the course requesting that I review it. I submit herein the results of
my review in a spirit of fraternal correction and concern and to assist
pastors and lay persons who lack time to read all the materials; a close
examination of the program by the competent ecclesiastical authority is
warranted to determine the advisability of its continued use.
In short, the program is a product of liberation theology and promotes
the ordination of women, recognition of homosexual marriage, the
feminization of God, extreme pacifism and environmentalism, using
non-Catholic and Catholic dissenters to present “Catholic Social
Teaching.” The JustFaith program is a partnership effort of Catholic
Campaign for Human Development, Catholic Charities USA and Catholic
Relief Services. It is billed as a ministry of the Church, “an
invitation to a rich spiritual journey into compassion,” to “look more
closely at the troubling issues of our times through the lens of
compassion and Catholic social teaching.” According to page two of the
Notes to participants, week 2, the program sets out to teach the "rich
tradition of Catholic Social Teaching." However, there is little
reference to the encyclicals, Catechism, conciliar documents or the
Summa Theologica where the Church’s authentic social teaching is to be
found. (Nota Bene: one of my sons is taking a course on Catholic Social
Teaching at a Catholic University; the curriculum consists of: Rerum
Novarum, Mater et Magistra, Quadragessimo Anno, Pacem in Terris, Gaudium
et Spes, Popularum Progressio, Octogessima Adviens, Laborens Exercens,
Sollicidudo Rei Socialis, Finitessimus Annus, section 10 of the 5th
Lateran Council, and sections of the Summa on Justice and
Cheating/Usury).
The very opening sessions of the JustFaith program are problematic. For
example, in week 2, the opening prayer invokes 21 “witnesses of hope,”
including Mohandes Gandhi–“great soul of peace,” Flannery O’Connor
(note: from my acquaintance with the life and writings of this great
American writer, I submit that she would strenuously object to JustFaith
and being prayed to for she was a devout Catholic), Thomas Merton (much
of his later work was heterodox), Martin Luther King, Jr., Joseph
Bernardin, Albert Schweitzer, concluding with, “All you holy men and
women, salt and light for our world, Pray for us.”Attachment B of the
same week lists discussion and dialogue goals, including the search for
the best “view,” incorporate varied perspectives, etc. There is no
reference to seeking, teaching, or understanding the truth as taught by
the Church. As Pope Benedict has reiterated, “real education is not
possible without the light of truth.”
There are 4 books in the program: Cloud of Witnesses by Wallis and Hollyday, Compassion by Nouwen, et al, The Challenge and Spirituality of Catholic Teaching, by Mich, and Amazing Grace
by Kozol. None of them has a Nihil Obstat or Imprimatur despite the
pretensions of this course to present the “rich tradition of Catholic
Social Teaching.” An examination of the content of the texts reveals
significant reasons there is not and should not be an official stamp of
the Church’s stamp of approval on any of these books or the program.
The Cloud of Witnesses book is most revealing of the agenda of
this program and of content contrary to the authentic social teaching of
the Catholic Church. It is clearly stated that, “The articles and
interviews in this book have been adapted from material originally
published in Sojourners magazine.” The author, Jim Wallis, was founder and executive director of Sojourners.
He has written in favor of gay “marriage.” The author, Joyce Hollyday,
is a minister in the United Church of Christ. Sojourners is described as
non-denominational according to its website, but includes left wing
Catholic peace activists and dissenters, a Masonic veterans group,
favors gay/lesbian partnerships, has a policy statement in favor of
recognition and legal protection for the same, including gay “marriage,”
and favors ordination of women, claiming five female ordinations and
female bishops. This background should constitute sufficient cause to
question inclusion of the book as a source of authentic Catholic Social
teaching.
In addition, out of 35 articles, only 11 appear to be about known
Catholics. I say “known” because the faith of some was not identifiable.
For certain, most were not Catholic at all and included a Living Waters
pastor, Georgia minister, Episcopal minister, Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Sojourner Truth, a Presbyterian pastor, a Quaker, three Baptists, one
now non-denominational former Methodist then Presbyterian, a Dutch
Reformed preacher and a number of others not Catholic but whose
denomination was not mentioned. Among the persons featured were a
draft-dodger, proponent of the ordination of women in the Episcopal
Church, one pastor and his wife imprisoned for non-payment of taxes, one
whose “consciousness” came from liberation theology and another who
said the truth was not the captive of any enterprise or religion.
Among the Catholics featured in the book were many known dissenters such
as Father Daniel Berrigan, Sr. Joan Chittister, Father Pedro Arrupe and
others who criticize the Church rather than advance her authentic
teachings. Some examples will suffice:
Joan Chitttister’s unabashed advancement of the ordination of women is
championed. She said, “There’s either something wrong with the present
theology of ministry, or there is something wrong with the present
theology of all the sacraments. If women qualify for baptism,
confirmation, salvation, and redemption, how can they be denied the
sacrament of ministry?” Her arguments that women are ignored in church
language and for the feminization of God are given ample play in the
text.
Jesuit superior general Pedro Arrupe openly rejected Humanae Vitae
and his “restructuring” of the Jesuits did much harm to the Order; the
circumstances of his removal are unclear to me, but Pope John Paul II
passed over Arrupe’s designated successor for another.
- Father Miguel D’Escoto is not permitted to celebrate the Eucharist in public or private.
Father Elias Chacour, a Catholic priest and pacifist in Israel, attacked
the wealth of the Church and described his despair of the institutional
Church and its hierarchy.
- Archbishop Dom Camara, who certainly
sacrificed for the poor of his native Brazil, was a devotee of Gandhi
and criticized the Church for its programs and priorities; at the
closing session of Vatican II, he proposed that all the bishops
surrender their crosses of precious metals for meltdown and distribution
of the proceeds to the poor.
Father George Zabelka is an extreme pacifist who accuses Christianity of seventeen hundred years of terror and slaughter.
- Journalist Penny Lernoux had distanced
herself from the Church but returned in the “awakening” of Vatican II,
which she described as “set to turn the Church on its head,” while she
was herself under the inspiration of liberation theology.
The magisterial authority of the Church was not recognized in this book.
There was a nice article on St. Francis of Assisi, who was called the
“greatest saint.” This book would be perfectly suited to a study of
liberation theology, which, of course, has been soundly refuted by the
Church beginning with Divini Redemptoris. Pope Pius XI stated
that the Church could not cooperate with Marxists. Liberation theology
would divert the Church from her mission of salvation to one of social
welfare agency.
One of the authors of Compassion was Henri Nouwen, who was described in Cloud of Witnesses as a Dutch priest and contributing editor to Sojourners.
His funeral Mass was described in the book as a “carnival atmosphere”
where actors and actresses “breathed life into the gospel reading.” In
the Preface, the tone of the book is set with a quote from theologian,
Gail O’Day, “Just as it is false to the richness of the Christian
tradition to use father language as generic language for God, it ....”
This book does more to diminish than to advance the true faith, for
example:
- The authors assert that the Gospels support reference to the “womb” of God (pp. 14-16).
- They say we should see compassion not in moralistic terms (emphasis
added; the implication is that we should disregard sin, p. 28).
- They wrote that choosing to suffer as “an obedient response to our
loving God” is, for Christians, a “false belief that in so doing they
were following the way of Jesus Christ.”
- The section on the breaking of bread omits all reference to
sacrifice and the Holy Eucharist as the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity
of Christ, the real presence; the sole emphasis is on community and
eating bread and drinking wine as a memorial, where we become intimately
connected “to the compassionate life of Christ.” (p. 111).
- Our “bread connections” are a “call to action.” He writes that when
people eat bread and drink wine in his (Christ’s) memory, "smiles appear
on strained faces" (p. 132).
The Mich book has some good quotes, including some references to
encyclicals and Saints, but they are interlaced with error. For example,
St. Boniface’s challenge to the god Thor inspired conversions but led
to the unintended consequence of “diminished awe for the sacredness of
nature.” (p. 34). We are instructed that every creature, animate and
inanimate, can be a “sacrament.” Life issues are discussed with no
reference to the evil of contraception.
We are told that there was an early Catholic attitude, still present,
that saw humans as the apex of creation and this too often led to
exploitation of nature (p. 41). Quoting Sister Elizabeth Johnson, the
author explains that “previous theologies would have human beings with
their rational souls as superior to the natural world.” Such a ranking,
he writes, easily “gives rise to arrogance, one root of the present
ecological crisis.” We are told that we need ‘species humility’ (p. 43).
I read this and wondered whatever happened to Genesis: man is made in
the image and likeness of God and has dominion?
On pages 43-44, we read that we must “reimagine our place in creation”
with these questions, each of which is directly or by implication in
conflict with the truth:
- How to preach salvation as healing and rescue for the whole world rather than as solely an individual relationship with God?
- How to let go of contempt for matter, contempt for the body and sexuality, and how to revalue themas good and blessed?
- How to interpret human beings as primarily “earthlings” rather than as pilgrims or tourists whose real home is elsewhere?
- How to recognize the sacraments as symbols of divine graciousness in a universe that is itself a sacrament?
- What kinds of new spiritualities will emerge as we become creation-centered?
The author references
Familiaris Consortio, then trashes it and exposes his real agenda:
"Today, Catholic theology and spirituality does not view the love of
another human being as distracting from our love of God. In fact, love
of a spouse and child is viewed as participation in divine love.
Sexuality is viewed in more positive terms as a gift of God to be
enjoyed and celebrated within committed love and not only tolerated for
the sake of procreation. These positive themes provide the starting
points for a reinterpretation of marriage and family within the
Catholic tradition. This revisioning is only in beginning stages.
Catholicism and other Christian denominations are still working on
understanding the role of women in the church and society and the
meaning of committed homosexual relationships." (p. 81, emphasis added)
No sugar coating can cover the bitter taste of this poisonous error!
The Kozol book contains wrenching stories from the author’s experiences
in South Bronx, significantly centered around St. Ann’s Episcopal Church
with its pastor, Rev. Martha Overall, who “confesses” the children.
What this book contributes to an understanding of Catholic Social
Teaching is a mystery. The book is interesting private reading, although
the heralding of it by Marian Wright Edelman of the Children’s Defense
Fund would have otherwise steered me clear of it.
Interestingly, both of the parishioners who brought to my attention that
Just Faith was in progress at our church are converts. They are
actively engaged in learning the Catholic Faith. One said to me,
“Something about this (Just Faith) material is really bothering me. I
don’t know why, but I am disturbed and irritated when reading it.” She
wants to deepen her understanding of the true Faith; most of this
material does just the opposite, leads away from it. The disturbance of
the spirit is easily understandable.
We possess the truth in all its beauty, richness and wonder; we possess
the authentic Magisterium. Why not use it? As the Holy Father has
reminded us, real education is grounded in truth."
Click here for another great article on the danger's of Just Faith from the Restore DC Catholicism blog, which has already amply documented the issue.
Click here for a follow-up article on the Marxist tendencies of JustFaith.
