Sitting Bull is the legendary first chieftain of the entire Lakota Sioux nation, a commonplace figure among the Wild West history of the American Frontier. Most everyone in grade school learns the history of his involvement with resistance against the government, his time spent with Buffalo Bill, and his unfortunate death. What most people don’t know about him, however, is that Sitting Bull wore a crucifix. Here’s why…
While most learn about Sitting Bull and the American Indians, most don’t learn about the great work done by Catholic missionary priests on the American Frontier. The most famous of these priests was the Jesuit missionary Pierre-Jean De Smet, one of the rare few trusted by the Lakota Sioux and a personal great friend of Chief Sitting Bull who became known as “Friend of Sitting Bull.”
The Sioux, especially Chief Sitting Bull, greatly admired the “black-robes,” as they called the missionaries. Father De Smet was so loved he was able to walk into an entire camp of five thousand unarmed and be greeted with welcome arms. Father De Smet first met Sitting Bull in 1848, when he was 17 and De Smet was 47. Bishop Thomas O’Gorman records in 1904:
“Father De Smet has left a complete record of his visit made in the summer of 1848, but says he was impelled to make that visit by interest aroused during a ‘transient visit to some tribes of Sioux, on the upper-Missouri, on my way back from the Rocky mountains.’”
While Father De Smet and Sitting Bull would likely have had multiple further encounters from 1848-1870, there is no baptismal record of Sitting Bull nor did De Smet ever mention it in his writings. Because Sitting Bull had multiple wives he did not give up, it remained an obstacle to his acceptance into the Church his entire life. The legend that he was a baptized most likely spawned from a New York Times article on September 23rd, 1883 that hints at the possibility of him becoming Catholic:
“An unforeseen obstacle to his [Sitting Bull’s] reception has been met in the shape of two wives, neither of whom Sitting Bull can make up his mind to part with. Until the red man brings himself to put aside one or the other of his marital companions he will be debarred entrance.”
If he wasn’t Catholic, why did he wear a crucifix? The answer to the reason why comes from a meeting in June of 1868, when Father De Smet met with Chief Sitting Bull near Fort Rice in efforts to gather signatures for the Treaty of Fort Laramie. When he arrived, one of the chiefs there told him: “If it had been any other man than you, Black-robe, this day would have been his last.”
During this meeting, Father De Smet presented Sitting Bull and principal war leaders American Cross and Two Bears with a crucifix and convinced the Sioux people to sign the treaty. When De Smet returned, General Stanley remarked that “Father De Smet alone of the entire white race could penetrate to these cruel savages and return safe and sound.”
This crucifix he received from Father De Smet in 1868 was the same one he wore in his most famous portrait taken in 1885. If you look closely, the crucifix has skull bones on its bottom. This type of crucifix was popular with Jesuit missionaries at the time because the world Calvary means “the skull,” meant to be a reminder of the story of Salvation and why Christ died for us.
9 comments:
Great Post….. I read a few of your other posts.
Thank you for your compliment. Sitting Bull was indeed a man after God's own Heart.
Edward Palamar...The Three Days of Darkness is a favorite of mine, just saying. Also, I took your blog "Risen from the dead", I agree. Christ indeed raises us from the dead and makes us alive in Him...thank you Lord.
You shared very nice and detail information with us .This article contain very useful things for us I am very excited bout this one it is so nice and very useful to us.Thank you for this information .we expect this kind of important information in future also so keep it up this nice work.
I’m really glad I have found this info. Today bloggers publish just about gossip and net stuff and this is actually irritating. A good site with exciting content, this is what I need. Thank you for making this web-site, and I’ll be visiting again.
We have entered the "age to come" foretold by Jesus in Mark 10:30.
We have entered the "age to come" foretold by Jesus in the Harmonious Gospel of Saint Mark (chapter 10, verse 30), the Glorious Manifestation of Our King, Lord, and Savior Jesus Christ.
http://risen-from-the-dead.forumotion.com/
VOCAL : The Three Days of Darkness have been foretold to begin with 10 simultaneous peals of thunder as the "great noise" of 2 Peter 3:10-14. While I was falsely imprisoned, a Catholic priest said that they would begin due to the unjust incarceration. There remain less than 317 days for restitution of the stolen property and associated damages.
it's too bad. in the early Church, they only forbade a man from serving in t he church, like as deacon, if they had more than one wife. They did not ban a man who already had two or more. But with the first generation of converts, maybe they shouldn't be forced to desert a wife they've had for years and had kids with- it's not exactly humane. unless of course she wanted to go. But this requirement could apply better to those who aren't married yet or married to one woman. And then forbidden a 2nd wife concurrently. Because they are now introduced to the Christian way of life, once past that first generation.
sorry i meant, the early Church didn't ban a man from the congregation of t he church entirely, if he had more than one wife already. They just didn't allow him any position like deacon etc. i don't see anything where they told them to abandon any of them either, in order to be merely baptized.
very nice blog everyone should appreciate your content which you have shared about Did You Know? The Reason Why Chief Sitting Bull Wore a Crucifix. I read with open mind and found that its very helpful and information for any of that who are really willing for it.
fertility treatment in Delhi
IVF Cost in Delhi
Post a Comment