NEW YORK, August 21 (C-Fam) UN agencies and bureaucrats have
been part of the global abortion industry for over two decades. But they
have never had much ability to compel countries to change their
abortion laws. Even though the new UN development goals contain no new
language to support a right to abortion, the document nonetheless will
open up additional avenues for abortion groups to pressure countries to
change their laws.
The newly minted Sustainable Development Goals, the most important UN
agreement involving social policy for over two decades, continue to
place abortion squarely in UN policy under the guise of sexual and
reproductive health and reproductive rights. This is not new. But the
new goals present grave new challenges to the pro-life cause.
The goals will be the mainstay of UN policy for the next 15 years.
They follow the model of the UN Millennium Development Goals, widely
viewed as having ramped up international aid and exerted unprecedented
influence on national policies. They are anticipated to mobilize several
trillion dollars, exponentially more money than any previous UN
development scheme. All that money will not come without strings
attached. We cannot be naïve.
Money has been and continues to be the principal game changer in the international pro-life battle.
Until now the pressure from the UN to change abortion laws has come
from mostly unknown “experts” working in the UN system, and rogue UN
officials. Because of the compromise struck at Cairo UN agencies that
receive money from pro-abortion countries have repeatedly denied that
they promote abortion, even though they do so both directly and
indirectly with impunity.
With the new UN goals countries may face pressure to change their
laws, as well as spend lascivious amounts of money on sexual and
reproductive health—thereby benefitting abortion groups—in order to
receive aid from wealthy pro-abortion countries as well as partner in
new global initiatives with the private sector and philanthropists.
Countries’ ability to benefit from the new development scheme may be
tied to their performance as measured by UN bureaucrats for whom illegal
abortion is synonymous with unsafe abortion and for whom no amount of
resources spent for UN style family planning is ever sufficient.
Proposed Indicators to measure progress on the new agenda from the UN
system already include access to abortion services, and the ability of
teenagers to access abortion without parental consent.
Despite these fresh threats to life, abortion groups that have spent
billions of dollars to create an international right to abortion have
not been able to gain any normative ground.
The new goals do not change the compromise struck at the 1994 Cairo
conference on population and development, namely, that abortion is not
an international right, and a subject to be dealt with exclusively in
national law—a consensus that reflects how no UN treaty includes a right
to abortion either expressly or by implication.
At the same time, abortion groups have become the beneficiaries of a
bonanza of funding for sexual and reproductive health and reproductive
rights as a result of the same Cairo agreement. Their lobbying and
increased influence at the national and international level, possibly
more than any other factor over the past two decades, has ensured that
the new UN development goals include more funds for their efforts to
make abortion a human right.

This is a significant change from the Millennium Development Goals,
agreed over a decade ago, which did not include abortion, focusing on
maternal health instead. The new goals include two targets on sexual and
reproductive health and reproductive rights instead, the trademark of
abortion groups.
The terms made their way into the new goals last year at the eleventh
hour, following underhanded negotiating tactics and arm-twisting, and
possibly only because at the time, many governments thought the goals
could still be changed. That was not to be.
When governments met again this year to discuss the new UN agenda for
development they decided to stick to the goals as agreed last year,
with few minor technical changes, and only negotiated a political
document to launch the goals into existence at a global summit of world
leaders this September.
The details of how the new UN scheme will be implemented are still
being worked out and are not expected to be finalized until next Summer.