NEW YORK, August 21 (C-Fam) UN agencies and bureaucrats have 
been part of the global abortion industry for over two decades. But they
 have never had much ability to compel countries to change their 
abortion laws. Even though the new UN development goals contain no new 
language to support a right to abortion, the document nonetheless will 
open up additional avenues for abortion groups to pressure countries to 
change their laws.
The newly minted Sustainable Development Goals, the most important UN
 agreement involving social policy for over two decades, continue to 
place abortion squarely in UN policy under the guise of sexual and 
reproductive health and reproductive rights. This is not new. But the 
new goals present grave new challenges to the pro-life cause.
The goals will be the mainstay of UN policy for the next 15 years. 
They follow the model of the UN Millennium Development Goals, widely 
viewed as having ramped up international aid and exerted unprecedented 
influence on national policies. They are anticipated to mobilize several
 trillion dollars, exponentially more money than any previous UN 
development scheme. All that money will not come without strings 
attached. We cannot be naïve.
Money has been and continues to be the principal game changer in the international pro-life battle.
Until now the pressure from the UN to change abortion laws has come 
from mostly unknown “experts” working in the UN system, and rogue UN 
officials. Because of the compromise struck at Cairo UN agencies that 
receive money from pro-abortion countries have repeatedly denied that 
they promote abortion, even though they do so both directly and 
indirectly with impunity.
With the new UN goals countries may face pressure to change their 
laws, as well as spend lascivious amounts of money on sexual and 
reproductive health—thereby benefitting abortion groups—in order to 
receive aid from wealthy pro-abortion countries as well as partner in 
new global initiatives with the private sector and philanthropists.
Countries’ ability to benefit from the new development scheme may be 
tied to their performance as measured by UN bureaucrats for whom illegal
 abortion is synonymous with unsafe abortion and for whom no amount of 
resources spent for UN style family planning is ever sufficient.
Proposed Indicators to measure progress on the new agenda from the UN
 system already include access to abortion services, and the ability of 
teenagers to access abortion without parental consent.
Despite these fresh threats to life, abortion groups that have spent 
billions of dollars to create an international right to abortion have 
not been able to gain any normative ground.
The new goals do not change the compromise struck at the 1994 Cairo 
conference on population and development, namely, that abortion is not 
an international right, and a subject to be dealt with exclusively in 
national law—a consensus that reflects how no UN treaty includes a right
 to abortion either expressly or by implication.
At the same time, abortion groups have become the beneficiaries of a 
bonanza of funding for sexual and reproductive health and reproductive 
rights as a result of the same Cairo agreement. Their lobbying and 
increased influence at the national and international level, possibly 
more than any other factor over the past two decades, has ensured that 
the new UN development goals include more funds for their efforts to 
make abortion a human right.

This is a significant change from the Millennium Development Goals, 
agreed over a decade ago, which did not include abortion, focusing on 
maternal health instead. The new goals include two targets on sexual and
 reproductive health and reproductive rights instead, the trademark of 
abortion groups.
The terms made their way into the new goals last year at the eleventh
 hour, following underhanded negotiating tactics and arm-twisting, and 
possibly only because at the time, many governments thought the goals 
could still be changed. That was not to be.
When governments met again this year to discuss the new UN agenda for
 development they decided to stick to the goals as agreed last year, 
with few minor technical changes, and only negotiated a political 
document to launch the goals into existence at a global summit of world 
leaders this September.
The details of how the new UN scheme will be implemented are still 
being worked out and are not expected to be finalized until next Summer.